NXT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Enphase Energy has a net margin of 16.96% compared to Nextracker's net margin of 8.35%. Nextracker's return on equity of 39.39% beat Enphase Energy's return on equity of 16.94%.

Nextracker has a consensus price target of $61.06, signalling upside risk potential of 4.7%. On the other hand Enphase Energy has an analysts' consensus of $52.93 which suggests that it could grow by 29.47%. Given that Enphase Energy has higher upside potential than Nextracker, analysts believe Enphase Energy is more attractive than Nextracker.

Nextracker has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Enphase Energy has a beta of 1.694, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 69.352%.

Nextracker has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Enphase Energy offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Nextracker pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Enphase Energy pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Nextracker quarterly revenues are $924.3M, which are larger than Enphase Energy quarterly revenues of $356.1M. Nextracker's net income of $156.8M is higher than Enphase Energy's net income of $29.7M. Notably, Nextracker's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.76x while Enphase Energy's PE ratio is 37.85x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nextracker is 2.94x versus 4.05x for Enphase Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

First Solar has a net margin of 16.96% compared to Nextracker's net margin of 24.81%. Nextracker's return on equity of 39.39% beat First Solar's return on equity of 16.68%.

Nextracker has a consensus price target of $61.06, signalling upside risk potential of 4.7%. On the other hand First Solar has an analysts' consensus of $201.64 which suggests that it could grow by 32.53%. Given that First Solar has higher upside potential than Nextracker, analysts believe First Solar is more attractive than Nextracker.

Nextracker has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison First Solar has a beta of 1.529, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 52.908%.

Nextracker has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. First Solar offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Nextracker pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. First Solar pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Nextracker quarterly revenues are $924.3M, which are larger than First Solar quarterly revenues of $844.6M. Nextracker's net income of $156.8M is lower than First Solar's net income of $209.5M. Notably, Nextracker's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.76x while First Solar's PE ratio is 12.94x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nextracker is 2.94x versus 3.84x for First Solar. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

FTC Solar has a net margin of 16.96% compared to Nextracker's net margin of -18.36%. Nextracker's return on equity of 39.39% beat FTC Solar's return on equity of -132.79%.

Nextracker has a consensus price target of $61.06, signalling upside risk potential of 4.7%. On the other hand FTC Solar has an analysts' consensus of $4.33 which suggests that it could fall by -2.37%. Given that Nextracker has higher upside potential than FTC Solar, analysts believe Nextracker is more attractive than FTC Solar.

Nextracker has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison FTC Solar has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Nextracker has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. FTC Solar offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Nextracker pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. FTC Solar pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Nextracker quarterly revenues are $924.3M, which are larger than FTC Solar quarterly revenues of $20.8M. Nextracker's net income of $156.8M is higher than FTC Solar's net income of -$3.8M. Notably, Nextracker's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.76x while FTC Solar's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nextracker is 2.94x versus 1.05x for FTC Solar. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Shoals Technologies Group has a net margin of 16.96% compared to Nextracker's net margin of -0.35%. Nextracker's return on equity of 39.39% beat Shoals Technologies Group's return on equity of 3.46%.

Nextracker has a consensus price target of $61.06, signalling upside risk potential of 4.7%. On the other hand Shoals Technologies Group has an analysts' consensus of $6.31 which suggests that it could grow by 33.4%. Given that Shoals Technologies Group has higher upside potential than Nextracker, analysts believe Shoals Technologies Group is more attractive than Nextracker.

Nextracker has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Shoals Technologies Group has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Nextracker has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Shoals Technologies Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Nextracker pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Shoals Technologies Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Nextracker quarterly revenues are $924.3M, which are larger than Shoals Technologies Group quarterly revenues of $80.4M. Nextracker's net income of $156.8M is higher than Shoals Technologies Group's net income of -$282K. Notably, Nextracker's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.76x while Shoals Technologies Group's PE ratio is 39.95x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nextracker is 2.94x versus 2.04x for Shoals Technologies Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.